Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 02:03, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

The Stony Brook Press Editorial Board
PRODded, but undone by article creator without comment. A list of the entire editorial board of a college newspaper. Unencyclopedic/Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information/Non-notable. Randwicked Alex B 09:45, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Stony Brook is a student newspaper, and this is merely a list of who works on it. Wikipedia is not a directory of names. Sjakkalle (Check!)  10:46, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree, list of students who worked on the paper.  nn for now.  -- Samir ∙ TC  [[Image:Flag of Canada.svg|25px|  ]] 10:47, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --Aaron 11:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn. --Ter e nce Ong 14:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kcordina 14:30, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; ciphergoth 17:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Fascists You guys are all fascists. Thousands of people have worked on this paper, you pathetic morons.  These are just the editors in charge.  What's so bad about having it there?  Is it taking up precious space?  If the wikipedia is supposed to be a collection of information, why is everyone such a dictator as to what stays?  And to the person who said "this is merely a list of who works on it": your negatism and complete ignorance astounds me beyond belief.  Above those qualities, however, is your narrow reductionism.  Go back to the list and look at the part that says Editorial Board before you cast your self-assured opinion of marginalization and belittlement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.212.65 (talk • contribs) 2006-02-23 12:30:22
 * "Negatism?" CrypticBacon 08:38, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The board itself has no notability outside of the context of the paper. Also, part of the list already appears in The Stony Brook Press article. C.Fred 03:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Another week, another accusation of fascism and cultural illiteracy. This information belongs on a web site, not on Wikipedia. — Adrian~enwiki (talk) 06:42, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. As far as the fascism, well, hey, Wikipedia is not a democracy! -- Kinu  t /c  07:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, unencyclopedic. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-24 08:11Z 
 * Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. CrypticBacon 08:39, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.