Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing this one due to early consensus. Missvain (talk) 21:58, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

The Story of Islamic Imperialism in India

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A self published book by author owned publishing company, lacking third party RS coverage. Fails all the criteria of WP:BOOKCRIT. Only has few mentions in primary or non reliable sources. Reference used in the article are primary sources. Tagged for notability issue since June 2020 Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Walrus Ji (talk) 09:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with Walrus ji. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom LeBron4 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete self-published books are almost never notable, there is nothing to suggest this is one of the extremely rare exceptions.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per the nomination and the arguments given above. Ngrewal1 (talk) 00:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like this work has been cited occasionally in places like Cambridge University Press, however from what I can see it's usually mentioned in relation to the publisher as an example of the types of work it releases. Google Scholar seems to suggest that this is a frequent use of the source. I can't access this journal article, but I'd wager that it's likely more of the same if the book is mentioned in the body of the article. Long story short, I can't really find anything that would show that the book is notable outside of its author or the publishing company he created. I'd say that this should be redirected, but I'm not sure if the author or the publisher would be the better redirect target or if it's really necessary, given that the publisher article doesn't mention it and it's not really something I'd see as a common search term. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.