Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Strawberry Alarm Clock (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Michig (talk) 07:18, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

The Strawberry Alarm Clock
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable show, no sources, fancrufty. Last AFD way back in the Stone Age failed to reach consensus. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:07, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:23, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:49, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't appear notable. -- No  unique  names  16:52, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 * How so? Sorry, but is the above !vote based upon any type of source searching? Several sources are available by simply clicking on the Google News archive search above and then reading some of the links. See also WP:N and WP:GNG. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 3 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Easy Keep - The topic passes WP:GNG per a plethora of easily-found reliable sources comprised of significant coverage about this radio program. Source examples include, but are certainly not limited to:, , , . Several more sources are available using this customized search. Deletion in this case doesn't serve the encyclopedia functionally, because per the project's editing policy, Wikipedia is a work in progress. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:52, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - the local sources from the Independent, have the feel of a routine reports on announcements, they have been thrown in a section of the article to give the appearance that it is referenced but do not support anything in the article. If anything can actually be sourced to a WP:RS then suggest a section in the article on the station and a redirect. Mt  king  (edits)  21:44, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:04, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - The topic seems notable and there are many reliable sources about the subject, as stated above. Vacation9 (talk) 00:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep many reliable sources available as showed above by Northamerica. Cavarrone (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Some references through 2006 are:
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There's more references beyond 2006, but you get the idea. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 09:34, 4 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Good finds. The Mirror called them a "hit morning show". Things happening to them or their host get coverage in various reliable sources.  D r e a m Focus  07:48, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.