Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Center_for_American_Progress. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:57, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The Structural Imbalance of Political Talk Radio

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable report. WP:COATRACK article for Mark Lloyd. Brandon (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Center for American Progress, where it is already adequately covered. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 01:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No reliable sources. --Dr.enh (talk) 03:34, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep It had reliable sources until deleted by Dr.enh. As it was only one of many projects for Center for American Progress, it really belongs broken out, or as part as a larger article about localism or control of broadcast media.Bachcell (talk) 22:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A think tank (americanprogress.org) and commentary on townhall.com are not reliable sources WP:RS. All are POV, and the first is also a Self-published source --Dr.enh (talk) 02:00, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I would wait for the AfD to close before these sources are removed. These may not be reliable, but they are not spamlinks either. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Center for American Progress - Schrandit (talk) 05:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment it seems like some may be arguing that we need reliable sources for the existence of this publication besides the publisher. the think tank is a reliable source for its own publications. we dont need any more, as its a noncontroversial issue that it was published. its notability, sources for its being commented on, etc. i agree we need more, or it may need to be merged with the think tank.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge with Center for American Progress, this is not independently notable. Simonm223 (talk) 02:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  22:45, 22 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Merge per above RadioFan (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.