Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Suicide of Leroy Sorbiec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123    (e)  23:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

The Suicide of Leroy Sorbiec
Disputed prod. Non-notable unpublished novel. Possibly hoax. -- RHaworth 07:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original article author placed in an edit summary: "Deletion request removed due to the fact that there is no formal reference sources. Quotes were obtained directly from the author."  This is unacceptable per WP:NOR, and the fact that no formal reference sources exist underscores the non-notability of this unpublished work.   lowercase  08:11, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources for reference available for study means that the claims as to notability are unverfiable. The article can be recreated when the novel has been reviewed in one or more Journals of Record and critically acclaimed.   (aeropagitica)    (talk)   08:21, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DarthVad e r 08:37, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete no reliable sources, original research - Motor (talk) 08:57, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons stated above. --Srik e it ( talk ¦  ✉  )  11:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Hmmm, I just voted on another AfD where User:Chunkymonkey was a major contributor to the article in question. Paddles 15:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks of sources. --Ter e nce Ong 15:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any info about the Suicide of Leroy Sorbiec.  I even checked the Library of Congress in the states (USA).  Cheers  --Starionwolf 19:30, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, and a lot is unencyclopaedic. The JPS talk to me  21:10, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. &mdash; Khoikhoi 04:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Master  jamie  23:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.