Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sun The Moon The Stars (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No consensus after 3 relistings (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 08:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

The Sun The Moon The Stars
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A quick renomination as the previous AfD was inconclusive and far too thinly attended. Again, no evidence the band meets the criteria of WP:NMUSIC, or comes close, so they are not notable. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 22:29, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Comment. The referenced staff review at Punknews is an acceptable source, but I'm struggling to find another. Alternative Press would be good but blurbs like this are just too brief to be considered significant coverage.  Gongshow   talk  07:14, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * An acceptable source? It has only one paragraph on the band, the first, which also includes a summary of recent heavy metal history. Hardly in-depth, and it's not the subject of the piece. It needs reliable sources on the band, from which the content of the article could be sourced.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 21:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * JohnBlackburne, the Punknews article that Gongshow referenced contains six (6) paragraphs specifically on the band. The band is most-definitely the subject of the piece. Is it possible you were confusing it with some other article?
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete unless more substantial sourcing is found, GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 15:33, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
 * John Blackburne, why is it that this page must come down, but one with even less notability, The Binary Code (band), can stay? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.160.236.32 (talk • contribs)
 * See WP:OTHERSTUFF – the status/notability/existence of other articles is irrelevant to this discussion.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 17:06, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: Let us try the third relist, may be smth comes out of it--Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:30, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep as having enough mentions, even if most are minor, to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 11:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.