Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Jenks24 (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

The Sunday Telegraph (Sydney)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable newspaper, failing WP:NNEWSPAPER and WP:GNG, despite being a common newspaper in Australia. Tagged for no references since February 2017. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism, News media,  and Australia. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:36, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep The nominator doesn't seem to have bothered to look for references before nominating the article for deletion. The Mumbrella website (which covers the Australian media) returns 25 pages of results for a search on this publication:, for instance, many of which seem usable. Nick-D (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Nick-D, I did not seem to find any notable references for that version of the Telegraph. Pining @Cunard, to see if he can find additional refs. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 08:33, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As the nominatior of this deletion discussion, I will move the Sunday Telegraph specific controversies already on The Daily Telegraph (Sydney) article, to the article mentioned in this discussion, so I at least have controversies with refs. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 08:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per Nick-D. Jenks24 (talk) 07:41, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't understand this AfD. As much as many refer to the paper as a chip wrapper, it is clearly notable. Lister needs a WP:TROUT. TarnishedPathtalk 11:42, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As the nominator of this discussion, I have added these references to the article:

As the nominator, I support a withdrawal of this discussion, per the above references I added. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:23, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.