Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  00:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

The Surprising Adventures of Sir Digby Chicken-Caesar

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an overly detailed play-by-play/fancruft of a sketch. Only sources are pretty much primary as said sources are from the network's website. Just like Numberwang (which was redirected), this sketch doesn't seem to have any real notability, as popular as it may be among fans. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:32, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. Even the title's POV! — BradV 05:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete even less notable than NumberWang, and unlike NumberWang hasn't inspired any jokes on its own AfD.Nick Connolly (talk) 06:27, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Don't look at me, Numberwang is the only TMaWL sketch I've seen so I can't make jokes on their other 38,295 (That's Numberwang!... sorry) sketches. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 13:52, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete As much as I love That Mitchell and Webb Look this isn't notable. Everything that could be salvaged is already in the That Mitchell and Webb Look article. Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 12:34, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Merge into That Mitchell and Webb Look, not worth having a separate article in this case. ۩ Dracion ۩    ✎ ✉  12:35, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Can be covered perfectly will in the article about the series, and unlike Numberwang, this is unlikely to be useful as a redirect.--Michig (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and nom   CWii ( Talk  15:06, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Luk  suh  16:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above arguments. Joelster (talk) 21:33, 5 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.