Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Swaen (malt house)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Kloosterzande. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 23:30, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

The Swaen (malt house)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP, unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent. JMHamo (talk) 15:30, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Merge as well as I hadn't actually thought of it but considering its history and age, it may be locally notable. Delete for now at best as this seems interesting but I'm not entirely convinced from the current coverage. Notifying the only still active AfC reviewer . SwisterTwister   talk  02:09, 3 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Selective Merge to Kloosterzande, which presently does not mention the malt house. Source searches are not providing enough coverage to qualify a standalone article. However, it is an historic establishment in the town, some sources exist (e.g. ), and a merge would enhance and improve the merge target article à la WP:PRESERVE. North America1000 02:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to Kloosterzande - I didn't think it was notable enough during the AfC process, and nothing has improved. Searches do not turn up enough in-depth coverage to warrant a standalone article, but its history could make a contribution to the target article.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:22, 7 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.