Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sweet Remains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Stifle (talk) 16:04, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Sweet Remains

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Aside from one of their songs being used in a commercial, I don't see how this meets WP:BAND. Not many reliable sources. Qxukhgiels (talk) 14:39, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Keep: The Sweet Remains is valid of an entry in Wikipedia for the following reasons: The Sweet Remains has been reviewed by the following major publications: Time Out NY, USA Today , and the Boston Herald , among others. Their most notable song "Dance With Me" has acquired over 4 million listeners on Spotify. Their membership includes three independently notable musicians (including lead singer Greg Naughton, who is an actor with several high-profile credits who is the son of Tony Award winner James Naughton and husband of five-time Tony nominee Kelli O'Hara.   ; they have toured domestically and internationally; and their song "What I'm Looking For" has been featured in a nationally broadcasted Subaru ad. Jbrendlinger (talk) 19:00, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep per Jbrednlinger. Earflaps (talk) 15:34, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 02:03, 27 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:51, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.