Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sxplay (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) WJ94 (talk) 12:53, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

The Sxplay
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Last time I nominated this article for deletion, I withdrew my nomination because a similar title I nominated shortly after apparently had hidden sources. No edits have been made to demonstrate that this topic warrants its own article. I just did a search again with a different search engine and while I am getting sources, the question now is if mentions of these sources are significant enough for the topic to warrant an article. I can't assess foreign language sources but I can say that, ignoring the contents and just looking at the listed sources, this article does not demonstrate that it meets notability guidelines. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 08:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Japan. AllyD (talk) 08:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Oricon, the national sales ranking for media, shows that several of her albums have charted, so she passes WP:NMUSIC. lullabying (talk) 09:30, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
 * This topic might be notable, but I still believe this biography of a living person requires significant cleanup. Almost all the information in this article is being taken from the artist's website, rather than more reliable secondary sources. Sure some of this information is true, but the information is currently not being supported by a reliable source. If there is a way to find secondary sources that verify the information currently present and add it that is the path I would prefer, if there isn't then a fundamental rewrite to stay encyclopedic is needed. Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 04:22, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Certainly, it needs a lot of work and more secondary sources. It looks like a lot of secondary sources are available in Japanese. With that said, an article that needs to be cleaned up is not the same thing as an article that should be deleted. If the topic is notable, I see no reason to delete it. lullabying (talk) 02:08, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per lullabying. — Jumbo T (talk) 12:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.