Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Syndicate (business group)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 05:16, 24 December 2019 (UTC)

The Syndicate (business group)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page is of dubious notability. Does not meet WP:GNG. Yoodaba (talk) 01:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:52, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  J947 's public account 22:37, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui 雲 水 10:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep Multiple references exist including several linked in the article that meet the criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 19:46, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - change !vote. I went back and double checked the sources that I originally believed meet the criteria. They don't. For example, I missed that The Verge article relies extensively on an interview with Jenkins, fails WP:ORGIND, etc.  HighKing++ 21:28, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete outright this promotional text, created by a couple of kamikaze accounts about a get-rich-quick-corporation, if it even exists. The sources cited are pathetic: An article in the South Utah St George News about a fraud case against Jeremy Johnson, containing not a pip about the subject; a pompous link to a Time report that turns out to be on "the myth of the millionaire college dropout", again without a single mention of the subject; some article that appeared on The Verge about Mitt Romney going to Scamworld and a similar one in PC World about the FTC cracking cown on internet scams, both unadulterated by mentions of our subject; then, some post by a blogger that's trivially dismissable; and so on. The reference to The Telegraph is about pick-up artists, online seduction and dating tips, with but a single mention of a person that's supposedly a co-creator of the syndicate, again without any mention of the syndicate itself. The article's subject is not notable. -The Gnome (talk) 19:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Nahal (T) 22:26, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.