Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tattooed Lady of Lochee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 16:22, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Tattooed Lady of Lochee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:NOTE and a Google search yields absolutely nothing on the subject Bvlax2005 (talk) 15:12, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete I'd G3 it as vandalism but I get trouted every time I do that. Clearly nonsense. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:25, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No Hammer, it is not nonsense. But the fact that the author has not managed to produce any substantial references in two days suggests that it is original fiction. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:48, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with Hammer. This is silly.  Well-crafted nonsense, but nonsense nonetheless. Mandsford (talk) 12:51, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete also delete related article Dark Lady of Logie. JuJube (talk) 22:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete All the earmarks of a hoax. Mandsford (talk) 00:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)




 * Comment. Now added AfD tag to Dark Lady of Logie and I !vote delete for her. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 02:23, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Given the creator's spelling difficulty, I tried a few different variations and couldn't find any information using google to verify this figure's importance or existence.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:44, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.