Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Terror was restored


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  01:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The Terror was restored

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Article about the non notable restoration of a non notable boat Daniel J. Leivick 00:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, this is a news story, and there's no sign that we have the sources to make an article about the boat. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 01:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and per Night Gyr's comments. --Dennisthe2 02:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - The author may want to try writing about the company who made these lines of boat and then give mention to this particular boat. But right now, it fails notability. Mkdw talk 03:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a boating club or magazine. J I P  | Talk 06:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for reasons outlined above. BTfromLA 07:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Walton monarchist89 13:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete it's great that they restored this boat, but there's no independent sources to indicate the notability or import of this restoration.-- danntm T C 14:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Big  top  18:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Magarmach 20:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I don't see the point of making an article about the restoration of a certain boat when that boat doesn't even have its own article to begin with. Metrackle 21:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Rename and Expand the last of a particular type of boat in an area could be notable, particularly if oysters were a significant part of the economy in said area. As it is, I agree that it's presented as a news story, which is unacceptable. JCO312 21:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Lajbi  Holla @ me  22:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete for all above by Snowolf (talk) on  21:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RFerreira 21:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.