Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Theory of 5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

The Theory of 5

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article. The references are not independent and reliable, per WP:GNG. There does not appear to be significant coverage in any other independent and reliable sources. MapleSoy (talk) 22:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

talk:Mtheletter|talk]]) 19:42, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I have found no reliable sources, no reviews. The book was self published, so I agree, looks like G11 candidate.Less Unless (talk) 19:53, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete The article does not support notability, neither has enough third party reliable sources. Nika2020 (talk) 19:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is promotional both for the book and writing competition, but lacks any real substance. Mtheletter ([[User
 * Delete This article survived 4 months?! I would have G11ed it by now! Non notable, promotional trash. Eternal Shadow   Talk  14:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Deletel. WP:NOTPROMO applies here as does a lack on indepth and independent coverage in reliable sources. ≫ ( Lil- Unique1 ) -{ Talk  }- 18:37, 30 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.