Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Things We Do for Mud//How Much Wood Can a Wood Pecker Peck?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was moot upon becoming a redirect. GRBerry 14:50, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

The Things We Do for Mud//How Much Wood Can a Wood Pecker Peck?

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a trivial episode that fails WP:EPISODE's criteria to build a good episode, and it shows no way to improve. By failing that, it fails WP:N, WP:V, and WP:RS, as it has no sources to assert and establish notability. It also fails WP:NOT for being mostly comprised of plot. TTN 17:59, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete—no assertion of notability, no real-world context.  Pagra shtak  18:27, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Iggy Arbuckle. No indication that the episode is independently notable. A few sentences in the main article will suffice to cover the subject. Otto4711 19:33, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete — Not-notable and not likely ever to be. (But I love the extra slash.) --Jack Merridew 10:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * (I've moved it to single-slash title) --Jack Merridew 10:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable.  Mindraker 12:41, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Iggy Arbuckle per nomination and User:Otto4711 and because of the probable difficulty of locating multiple authoritative independent sources for citation. Alice.S  05:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Couldn't you all say "Unfortunately not notable" instead of "not notable", to soften the blow? Show some pity! (Crying worsens even more) I'm an article's mother, whose children are being sentenced to death, semi-permanently or even permanently, and no one even has heart enough to console me for it! What kind of encyclopedic society is this, anyway! I'm asking you, article's mother to other article's mothers/fathers - (ceasing to cry for a moment) surely you've all created articles at some point, right? (Resumes crying) Wilhelmina Will 00:21, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per TTN; a redirect would be acceptable, but what's the point really with such trivial information. Eusebeus 15:38, 29 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.