Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Three Sisters (Kashmir)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

The Three Sisters (Kashmir)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Notability not shown, just a grouping of three rivers. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to even find any sources confirming that the three rivers together have that name. I note also that, of the two sources that were in the article, one was just some guy's CV and the other failed verification and does not include the word "sister". Dricherby (talk) 20:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * It does however confirm that the three rivers are right tributaries, which is what it is sourcing. Rich Farmbrough, 22:59, 23 May 2012 (UTC).


 * On a closer reading of the source, I agree, so I'll remove the fv tag.Dricherby (talk) 08:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment People searching for sources should note that "Nallah" and "Neelum" can also be spelled "Nalla" and "Neelam", respectively. Dricherby (talk) 20:21, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note for all My dear fellow members: You will not be to find this article name [The Three Sisters (Kashmir)] from any source or from any where. This is a concept a sort of category based on the similarities between the three rivers.
 * They rise from eastern Himalayan glaciers and lakes in the vicinity of Sonamarg, being the base camp for trekking to thier sources.
 * They flow from east to west.
 * Jehlum River which flows from south to north cuts them off, hence becomes their mouth ,and are called right tributories.
 * All the three rivers have good stock of trout fishes, and flow at a good pace which makes them feasible for river rafting.
 * These similarities prove that they belong to a common group which was unnamed and unreported till date.I‘ve given them this name based on the similarities, this topic is some kind of a category.
 * This article meets the critera for deletion, but please consider if there is any way that this article may survive.... I‘m a geographerI can prove the realiblity of the article but I don‘t have any source which will mention the name of the article. Thanks! Mehra j Mir  '(Talk)  08:28, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * In that case, the article is original research and a clear violation of WP:NOTMADEUP. Can we get this closed speedily? Dricherby (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Maybe the term can be removed and and article made on tributaries of the Jhelum? Rich Farmbrough, 09:33, 24 May 2012 (UTC).


 * The tributaries themselves (which are by no means the only tributaries of the Jhelum) already have articles, as does the Jhelum. While a section on tributaries would be appropriate in Jhelum River, I can't imagine what would be said in Tributaries of the Jhelum River that isn't already said in the existing articles of the individual rivers concerned. Dricherby (talk) 09:43, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes it would be better at least started as a section. There appears to be a triple peak nearby (relatively) that may be called the three sisters, and some springs, but I think it best if this page goes. Rich Farmbrough, 04:37, 27 May 2012 (UTC).


 * Delete as original research. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:OR. Even if the author (or anyone) does at some point prove through reliable sources that the rivers are really called "The Three Sisters", this one-liner info can go in the Jhelum River article. No reason to keep separate article. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - it was a keep if more focus was there on the term "The three sis" rather then their info but still it would not be notable enough.  →TSU tp* 04:40, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.