Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tontons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep--Ymblanter (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

The Tontons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Another editor's PROD was contested. Concern was: Appears to be self-promotion. Eeekster (talk) 00:16, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment. Hi, I just tried to edit the article to make it sound less promotional. I'm not going to !vote on this because I don't have much experience with this type of band, but my personal opinion is that the band meets WP:GNG because of the amount of coverage. --gdfusion (talk&#124;contrib) 02:07, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 02:15, 18 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Where's the self promotion? Any article about a band is going to be a bit promotional, but as it stands now this article seems neutral enough to me, and the local accolades seem sufficient for notability. Meters (talk) 02:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep Also found and added some national coverage. Clearly notable, it doesn't sound promotional to me (thx gdfusion for improvements on that). Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 23:02, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NOTABLE. Harrison2014 (talk) 17:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.