Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tony Blair Witch Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I laughed at the title, but the consensus of the discussion is obvious, and laughable titles are not a notability criterion. joe deckertalk 02:47, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

The Tony Blair Witch Project

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I don't give a shit if this film is on the IMDb bottom 100 films list, it's a non-notable film regardless. The only coverage is from user reviews or reliable sources only mentioning the name of the film only, that's it! editorEهեইдအ😎 21:58, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete IMDb is not a reliable source, and it seems to be the only place that this film has such recognition/ Tpdwkouaa (talk) 04:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Well, I'll have to thank you for at least making strong a argument here, unlike the participants involved in the other Blair Witch-related discussions I started. editorEهեইдအ😎 04:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  05:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  Vipinhari  &#124;&#124;  talk  05:36, 21 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No coverage to meet the general notability guidelines nor does it meet those for films. I also cannot find any information outside of IMDB. Opencooper (talk) 07:55, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - The world is full of goofy films, and only a fraction of them are notable enough to have their own page. As stated above, this movie just doesn't seem to pass the bar in terms of our guidelines. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 00:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.