Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tourist (upcoming film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  17:01, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

The Tourist (upcoming film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete per crystal. Sources are substandard and most are photo galleries. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 04:47, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Pardon, but you've overlooked that WP:CRYSTAL does not somehow forbid articles about completed films simply pending release. For those instances we look to WP:BEFORE and more importantly to WP:NFF (paragraph 3).  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  sst  ✈  05:17, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * year:
 * filmmaker:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * lead:
 * producer:
 * producer:


 * Keep as filming has begun and completed and its production has coverage to meet WP:NFF specifically. While yes, not all are usable (a correctable issue)... enough are. Unlike, I am unable to inexplicably conclude that "all" the used or the many unused available sources are all bad,  and I am thinking that WP:BEFORE was not followed. For example, and since this was shot in Italy, I easily found plenty of acceptable non-English sources to bolster English ones: Firenze Today (Italian), MET (Italian), [ Capital Italiano (Italian)], Intoscana (Italian), Aska News (Italian), Portale Giovani (Italian), Cine Turismo (Italian), Mister Movie (Italian), Optima magazine (Italian)... (and there's more).  Title will require changing per WP:NCF to The Tourist (2016 film). It serves the project that this remain and have any issues addressed through regular editing and using available decent sources.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:52, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Update: Others are invited to look at what was originally nominated and compare it to that which was easily improved through regular editing to remove poor sources, fix decent citations and, through use of the many available sources, add more. Thanks.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:53, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  20:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per Schmidt. North America1000 09:04, 26 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.