Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tracy Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus  DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

The Tracy Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is on the verge of being promotional. It contains nothing but a list of bare links, of which this is the only one to a reliable source, a short article on the Wall Street Journal blog from 2009. There seems to be nothing more recent, indicating that this turned out not to be so notable after all. I can find nothing more that's relevant or reliable. Drmies (talk) 19:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Possibly part of a little walled garden with Crowell Advertising, also nominated. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:10, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:03, 11 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: final relist &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  15:52, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Delete - Inside joke of a self congratulatory oorder seeking external lifeBrainplanner (talk) 16:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as entirely advertorial, nothing actually minimally convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  19:32, 3 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.