Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Tragedy of Macbeth Part II


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Noah Lukeman. Yunshui 雲 水 11:50, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

The Tragedy of Macbeth Part II

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

In attempting to fix the tag I failed to find a single secondary source, despite what appears extensive efforts by the author or publisher to promote it at the time of release. I haven't found a single review of this book or a performance of it as a play, much less from a publication whose name I recognise. Xover (talk) 08:43, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:53, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect to author page as not notable book. There are a couple of sources providing short notes but no full-length review. It might also be mentioned briefly in Macbeth in popular culture. Note: I'm not totally sure that Lukeman is himself notable, but he's discussed in several publications about writers/for writers whose status as reliable sources is unclear. --Colapeninsula (talk) 12:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Noah Lukeman; I'm not sure he's notable, but that's not an issue here. (I wouldn't recommend an AfD of that page).  There's no evidence this passes WP:NBOOK. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 01:07, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect As others have noted the book does not meet WP:NBOOK. However, the title may be something people search for and should be preserved. Chetsford (talk) 08:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.