Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Travellers' Bible


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  15:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

The Travellers' Bible


Fails WP:WEB, non-notable wiki.  Cool Blue  talk to me 00:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hardly any GHits, not a lot of info on the Wiki itself, plus some of that damnable "find new & used" advertising on the side. I say it's non-notable. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:33, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB. Alex43223T 01:47, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Phoenix2  (talk, review) 01:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 02:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, Oxford imprimatur means notability can't be ruled out in the future, but it does not have it yet. --Dhartung | Talk 03:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable and unsourced. &#10154; Hi DrNick ! 04:31, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, the website is not notable at this stage. Lankiveil 04:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete. As above, fails WP:WEB miserably. May become something in the future but not at this point.  Jody B   talk 12:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 20:26, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. -- Random Say it here! 22:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, lacks notability supported by references.  *Cremepuff 222*  23:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: At this stage, the site lacks the content and participation levels to be considered a notable website in my opinion. -- bdud e  Talk  00:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

'Tip to nominator: Consider using the proposed deletion process for uncontroversial deletions, such as this one. Thanks!' -- King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;   &spades;  15:42, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.