Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Treacle People


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) ‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ FOARP (talk) 11:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

The Treacle People

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The Treacle People seems not to abide by WP:NTV. From my own searches, there doesn't seem to be any consistent coverage from sources that are reliable and notable. The article is currently based off of a cartoon blog, and the show's IMDb page was the only other major source I could find (see WP:IMDB). If no one else can find a reason for its notability to be included on Wikipedia, I believe it should be deleted. Coalah (talk) 13:55, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Comics and animation,  and United Kingdom.  ULPS  ( talk •  contribs ) 14:15, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see a WP:GNG pass based on this source, this source, and their BAFTA award nomination. FOARP (talk) 15:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: Agree on the first source and the BAFTA nomination, not so sure about the book mentioning their Christmas episode. Also, the first source discusses the show in its development stages, I feel like we would need a source that discussed the show in past or present tense to a significant extent? Coalah (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There's also the Manchester Evening News story now linked in the article. The BAFTA nomination was of course retrospective, but this is not an WP:EVENT so we do not need to show lasting or retrospective coverage. The Christmas Special coverage is coverage of the show. FOARP (talk) 13:52, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I see your point. Keep, although the article clearly needs a bit of cleaning-up. Coalah (talk) 14:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.