Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Treedom Group


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  00:29, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

The Treedom Group

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Repeatedly tagged as A7, placing here for community input. TomStar81 (Talk) 11:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. OnionRing (talk) 11:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as there's still actually convincing and the user has not listed enough convincing sources, but even then there's also then nothing else for any notability overall. SwisterTwister   talk  01:24, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep According to The Nation, The Treedom Group is "the No 1 manufacturer and exporter of oud oil in Thailand, has hit full speed in its bid to become the leading oud oil producer in Southeast Asia." . So, how is this company not notable? By the way, that's a long article. The National also has impressive coverage, and there's no doubt that this is a huge international company . Trade Arabia has this article . Again from The Nation there's abundant coverage . This is an incredibly notable company. Someone just has to improve the article. Dontreader (talk) 06:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has been significantly improved since it was nominated for deletion with good enough references. LaMona (talk) 04:47, 7 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  03:21, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment I found an article with very significant coverage in the Bangkok Post . So, in this AfD I have provided sources from two newspapers in Thailand (The Nation and the Bangkok Post), a newspaper in the United Arab Emirates (The National), and a business news portal in Bahrain (Trade Arabia). I also found articles that are press releases issued by the company, so they don't qualify as independent sources. However, in my opinion the articles I've provided show that the subject easily passes GNG, and I suppose that there are additional solid articles in Thai and in Arabic, but I cannot yet think of a way to find a translation for "The Treedom Group" into those languages for further searches. Dontreader (talk) 09:06, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment As I suspected, there are sources in Arabic, such as this shorter article in Al Bayan newspaper from the United Arab Emirates, and this longer one in Al Arabiya news channel . Those are on the first two pages of Google results. No point in looking for more. Now, in Thai, I found an article in Khao Sod newspaper , and in the Siam Turakij semi-weekly business newspaper (according to Media of Thailand) . There's at least one more. Just search for "เดอะทรีด้อมกรุ๊ป" Dontreader (talk) 10:17, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per 's sources and analysis. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:43, 15 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.