Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Matteo Ricci. Was already merged to Matteo Ricci. Further discussion can take place on talk page. -- Cirt (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Horrible article. I have serious doubts about the notability of this work. D O N D E groovily  Talk to me  03:58, 9 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep The True Meaning of the Lord of Heaven is not an article. It is a small section in the WP article about Matteo Ricci. While that section clearly needs referencing, I do not think that AfD should be used as a tool for editing articles.  Uncensored Kiwi  Kiss 09:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Close discussion This should be a paragraph on Talk:Matteo Ricci and not here at AfD. A 'citation needed' tag on the section would have sufficed. 'Horrible article' is not a ground for deletion. The section in question does need referencing, and expansion on the controversy (perhaps), but 'horrible'? How? Peridon (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Close I nominated this on October 9. merged it three days later without commenting here. Also, when I looked thru the page history a couple minutes ago, I didn't see the AfD notice on the page. Looks like me or Twinkle screwed this up and the discussion got forgotten.  D O N D E groovily   Talk to me  18:03, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You're right - there's no sign of AfD in the history - or of you, even. I would be interested to know how Uncensored Kiwi found it - I came in through patrolling New Accounts and didn't notice the date until you pointed it out. Peridon (talk) 22:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.