Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Truth of the Gospel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete - Non-admin closure of speedy delete by User:Thingg § FreeRangeFrog  07:28, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

The Truth of the Gospel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD; original research at best. § FreeRangeFrog 03:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete perhaps as CSD G? Seriously, let's get rid of this as quickly as possible since it's pretty embarrassing. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * There's no speedy for this (otherwise I would have tagged it), and the author obviously removed the PROD. There should be a way to speedy things like these. § FreeRangeFrog 04:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * CSD doesn't cover original research since there needs to be wider discussion and consensus in order to be determine that the content in question is indeed original research and not poorly covered, but nonetheless peer-reviewed or commonly accepted material. That being said, this is a fairly clear cut case, but the five day process is still needed as a safe-guard, since it is assumed that editors are submitting articles for inclusion in good faith Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 05:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I understand that to be a component of WP:BITE and I agree with it. In some cases what was blatant OR might even end up turning into a good article. But sometimes... § FreeRangeFrog 05:41, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete: openly admitted OR. Wikipedia does not acknowledge the Holy Spirit as a reliable source.  Baileypalblue (talk) 04:35, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: obviously WP:OR  §hawn poo   04:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Blatant original research, unsourced. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 05:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:SNOW if not Speedy. THF (talk) 05:39, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete that research page in this hour without delay. Alexius08 (talk) 07:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.