Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Twilight Rune


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete a7 (no indication of notability for author), WP:SNOW, WP:CRYSTAL. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:46, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The Twilight Rune

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreleased and apparently uncompleted book by a non-notable author. Article had been PRODed, then dePRODed by the article's author. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NOT, notability is neither asserted nor present, no reliable sources, etc.  Accounting4Taste: talk 20:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. per WP:CRYSTAL. Book isn't releasing til 2010, this is all just speculation. Radiant chains (talk) 20:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per above. JNW (talk) 20:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete CRYSTAL + no indication of publisher. I have distinct suspicions about this. Next, in 10 pages of Google results I can only find one book fair in Haddington. This one was at Haddington Infants school, and it raised £780. My congratulations to them. I feel it would be an unlikely venue for announcing a new fantasy series, though. There appear to be 0 ghits for Jera Peachy, so the announcement doesn't seem to have been particularly noted. As is often the case with these book announcements in Wikipedia, I hope the book is better written and proofed than the article. Peridon (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've just realised what the Plot summary stirred up in my mind. Lewis Carroll's Bruno and the way he told a story. Peridon (talk) 23:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete since this is not notable--and it doesn't even exist. Drmies (talk) 20:33, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotion of vanity item. --TS 16:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.