Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Two Towers (MUD) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  07:19, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

The Two Towers (MUD)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It was a merge candidate in 2010 and the sourcing hasn't improved since then. A redirect to Middle-earth in video games would suffice. czar 06:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  06:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: In 2010 I voted Keep or smerge-redirect while the AFD was closed as keep. I still feel the article can stand alone given the supporting references, however if a redirect is decided it should be performed as a proper merge, including the references because some are now hard to find online, being partly offline material published in the 1990s. The Nimrod Jones 1997 research paper that refers to this MUD is now archived here. My comment likely also applies to other internet topics from the 1980s and 1990s. -84user (talk) 08:00, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The coverage available is too trivial to say the GNG has been met, and I've tried extensively to find more coverage and failed. —chaos5023 (talk) 18:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources listed in the previous AfD are really unconvincing.  A brief entry in a "best of the web" book?  I would categorize that as similar to a database entry at AllMusic for a garage band.  Sure, we've got proof in a reliable source that it exists, but I don't see that as significant coverage.  However, Tolkien's immense popularity makes research difficult, so I guess there could be something better buried there. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:52, 18 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.