Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Two of Us (mixtape)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. The deletionist views are weakly expressed and not sufficient to reach that consensus. Some suggested redirect, which may be done outside of the AfD as no clearer consensus has emerged since the 2nd relist. (non-admin closure) Bungle (talk • contribs) 11:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

The Two of Us (mixtape)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable release per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUMS received little/no coverage beyond its existence and track listing. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 22:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{  Talk  }- 22:46, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: The mixtape has received some coverage. I also found some reliable sources about it:, , , , , , , and . With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:45, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * The majority of the sources you refer to only have passing mentions about the existence of the project and little else. Coverage has to beyond the mixtape existing and being released. ≫  Lil- Unique1  -{ Talk  }- 16:00, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , sources 1 and 2 have a paragraph talking about the mixtape. The rest of the sources fully talk about the album, with source 6 being a review of it. Therefore, your claim that these sources "only have passing mentions about the" mixtape are baseless since they really talk about the mixtape, whether fully or by at least a paragraph. My keep stands. ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. KidAd   talk  04:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Chloe x Halle discography per nom. Does not meet WP:NALBUMS. Lack of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject, no chartings, certifications or accolades. -- Ashley yoursmile!  19:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Chloe x Halle discography. Does not meet WP:GNG, let alone WP:NALBUM. The sources as cited above said that the sisters themselves don't call it a "mixtape" (what?), and most sources only discussed this because it was kind-of endorsed by Beyonce. This review by The Yale Politic seems good, but it is a student newspaper, so I don't think it is credible as a reliable source. HĐ (talk) 15:17, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources presented by Astig and HD. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:26, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  12:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.