Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The UK Board

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Bratsche talk 5 pillars 02:17, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

The UK Board
Delete. A bunch of people from some game forum sitting around and talking about it in Wikipedia article space. FreplySpang (talk) 9 July 2005 00:43 (UTC) Lord Patrick 20:56, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not encyclopedic. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  July 9, 2005 00:51 (UTC)
 * The UK Board is being constantly vandalized to remove/alter the VfD notice; also note the vandalism to 313. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  July 9, 2005 01:23 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's lame. &mdash; (81.86.186.31's 6th edit.)
 * Speedy delete drini &#9742; 9 July 2005 01:35 (UTC)
 * Delete and condemn the article and all its contributors (save for the VfDer). -Splash 9 July 2005 01:39 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly. :-) FreplySpang (talk) 9 July 2005 01:40 (UTC)
 * Delete all traces. Bad, bad and bad.  It is the perfect exact opposite of encyclopedic.  And bad.  --A D Monroe III 9 July 2005 02:27 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed with the above
 * Delete. Article is, um, cheesy. humblefool&reg;Have you voted in the CSD poll yet? 9 July 2005 03:43 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 9 July 2005 04:16 (UTC)
 * Delete without honor or humanity. ShadowMan1od 9 July 2005 05:52 (UTC)
 * For the love of god, just delete it before it makes my brain collapse in on itself Cyclone49 9 July 2005 10:53 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mikeplokta 9 July 2005 11:13 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks like vain patent nonsense to me. tregoweth July 9, 2005 17:14 (UTC)
 * Delete- not because I got mad reading it, I want to save others going my way.--Bhadani 9 July 2005 17:27 (UTC)
 * Delete Vanity, non notable, written so horrifically that it makes reality TV look intelligent, and POV beyond all knowing
 * Delete Same reasons as above --Joelito 01:45, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, that's just too much. —  THOR 09:08, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, This is an entry in an encyclopedia for who's benefit exactly? Stephenb 13:23, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.