Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The US Navy in the 21st Century

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 23:30, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

The US Navy in the 21st Century
Quite interesting, but unfortunately not encyclopedic ("Wikipedia is not a crystal ball"). &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 20:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - A person's interesting conjectures as to the future needs of the US Navy. However, a person's conjectures are not encyclopedic. --FCYTravis 21:46, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * It can't be from a public release of the navy itself ("threats... of the People's Republic of China and possibly a resurgent Russia"); on the chance the authors are taking these proposals from a significant think tank or analyst active in the public discourse, they could possibly be mentioned, attributed to their source, somewhere related article. I doubt it though. The only real information is that there are 12 supercarriers and 25 Ticonderoga-class Cruisers. Delete: crystal ball, POV, soapbox. Samaritan 21:50, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --bainer 23:26, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obscure pagename that wouldn't inspire a search. hydnjo talk 03:31, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.