Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ultimate DisneyMania Collection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW delete  Jclemens (talk) 23:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

The Ultimate DisneyMania Collection

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Apparently imaginary album. Completely unsourced, targeted for release two years from now. WP:CRYSTAL violation. &mdash;Kww(talk) 19:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No evidence of its future existence found. I42 (talk) 19:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Remarkably detailed track listing for something that presumably hasn't been recorded, as the alleged release date is two years from now. Unsourced and unsourcable article on a future Disney release, although in a strangely familiar style. :) FlowerpotmaN &middot;( t ) 21:15, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- in fact, this is a borderline speedy as hoax. Well-written article, but the only Google hit is Wikipedia itself. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 22:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- the fact that one of the categories doesn't exist, and that whoever wrote this can't disambuguate the pages to the correct targets, is proof that this is fake. Not only that, but this skips plenty of Disney movies. Where's Everybody Wants to Be a Cat? Or Someone's Waiting for You? Or Best of Friends? Or The World's Greatest Criminal Mind? Ilikepiepieisawesomeright (talk) 03:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Whilst I support delete, this logic is baffling. I42 (talk) 06:56, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Once again a new hoax once again from the Disneymania/Sher'Quan Johnson vandal, who has posted false Disneymania album articles deleted in the past here, here, here, here, and here. Suggest a block of MakeLove91 for sockpuppetry.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 04:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree with Nate -- tagged article as unreferenced and a hoax, the fact that they can't even have ONE SONG from The Fox and the Hound = vandalism. Seriously, that movie is a classic. Anyone else agree? Also, at Talk:Walt Disney Platinum Editions, I tried asking if Fox and the Hound is really gonna get a Platinum Edition. I hope so, it's a classic! Ilikepiepieisawesomeright (talk) 04:24, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.