Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unband


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:15, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

The Unband

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources at all, and none that i can find. Certainly no charted hits, no gold records, and no coverage trivial or otherwise anywhere. Clear fail of WP:MUSIC Bali ultimate (talk) 16:45, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Added their album as well. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Coverage by allmusic, rolling stone and pop matters is enough. Rolling Stone, Allmusic, pop matters, [EZ Rock]. Article needs serious work though. --neon white talk 20:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Neon white, sources do exist to satisfy C1 of WP:BAND but the article needs major work. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:49, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:MUSIC. I tickled up the album page too and added the Allmusic review.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 20:56, 18 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep winrar Koptor (talk) 23:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep-- A Rolling Stone review is enough to establish notability. --J.Mundo (talk) 03:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.