Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unbearable Lightness of Being a Dickhead


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Mr Floppy. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

The Unbearable Lightness of Being a Dickhead

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find any reliable secondary sources online easily. I think this should just be deleted and merged into the Mr. Floppy article. The article itself appears to be entirely original research. If multiple reliable sources can be added, fabulous, if not, delete or perhaps merge. SarahStierch (talk) 05:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an important document in the history of Australian punk. FokkerTISM 05:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Says who? If you've got good sources that say that, then it might be keepable.--Colapeninsula (talk)


 * Delete Fails NALBUMS and the beginning of the article seems to be a copy paste from here. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge to Mr. Floppy. Plenty of room int he parent article to cover this subject if it's not independently notable. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment There are currently no reliable sources at Mr Floppy, so merging might be premature. I suggest if people feel this interesting-sounding act deserves any Wikipedia coverage, they try to save the main Mr Floppy article, because the articles on their other recordings, Firm and Fruity, 100 000 Morrisseys, Breakfast (Mr Floppy album), and Gratuitous (album), are totally lacking in reliable sources and quite likely non-notable. --Colapeninsula (talk) 18:31, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge without prejudice - it did well at the time and there's plenty of sources from the time (which I remember), but they're all on paper so unlikely to be brought up in the next week - David Gerard (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:02, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:20, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete If this is, in fact, an important item in the history of Australian punk, it would be extremely easy to verify since a book or article about Australian punk would mention it. As it looks like there's some question about the notability of the artists page as well, just delete this for now and work on sourcing that page. If that article is significantly improved and sourced, there may be room for more detail, but that's after, not now.-Markeer 00:07, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge without prejudice – It was mentioned in Australian independent music press of the time, unfortunately much of that material is not on-line nor easily accessible.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:58, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Merge without prejudice - I'm sure that as indicated above that at the time of its release the album was subject to independent comment/review. It is clear that the band and their recordings had some influence on other Melbourne bands. Considerable work has been done by various editors on improving the Mr Floppy improving and sourcing information contained therein. Dan arndt (talk) 02:10, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.