Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Underground Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  02:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

The Underground Alliance

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete unremarkable myth, no relevant ghits, no refs, prod turned down -Zeus-uc 20:24, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete A bank puts up a statue of the inventer of the underground drilling machine. This means there must be a network of underground tunnels emanating from the bank. Move to Wikiconspiracy. Redddogg (talk) 20:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * p.s. If I had a network of underground tunnels I wanted to keep secret I would not put up a statue that draws attention to them. Redddogg (talk) 21:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a red flag move, obviously :) Delete §FreeRangeFrog 22:54, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  04:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Deletean unimportant myth, article looks like a conspiracy theory, not an encyclopaedia entry. Rexfan2 (talk) 05:07, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Two of the claimed sources are searchable in Google Books, and neither makes any mention of Greathead. That must cast doubt on the other sources presented by the same editor. And by searching in various venues I can't find any publication that mentions both Gilliant and Greathead. I suppose this just means that the conspirators have done a good job of keeping this secret up to now - I'm sure they'll be very annoyed that a Wikipedia editor has finally given the game away after all these years. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.