Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Union League Golf and Country Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 00:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

The Union League Golf and Country Club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Mandatory AFD: hangon template placed Belinrahs (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment. Am I missing something here? Since when does a hangon = mandatory AfD? If the speedy is declined by an admin, AfD may be appropriate. – ukexpat (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment As far as I have learned, hangon = AFD nom. The nom reason could be interpreted as the reason put for the speedy. If anyone handy in Wikipedia policy can give me input (and corresponding proof, such as a link to that policy) on this matter, tell me on my talk page. I'll continue to do what I'm doing until I am told otherwise. --Belinrahs (talk) 19:14, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * You have learned wrong. A hangon does not require an AfD.  The removal of a PROD tag reqires an AfD if the initial prodder or anybody else feels that the article should still be removed.  Did you read the hangon tag? :Note that this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon   Corvus cornix  talk  00:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. —TreasuryTag talk contribs  17:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - any course designed by Alister MacKenzie is notable in my book. ArcAngel (talk) 17:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep In any case, I just declined the speedy, since it is a very famous club of great historical significance in California, and there are abundant sources.  I don't understand "delete per nom," since there is no reason for nomination given. I suppose it means "because its spam", since it was speedied as G11. However, I think any spam can be removed or rewritten, & the article is not primarily promotional .  DGG (talk) 17:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs cleanup and copy edit, but definitely appears to be a notable golf course. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 18:13, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, and per TPH, needs cleanup and wikification. Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - and sourcing! -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.