Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The University Register


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07  ( T ) 13:31, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

The University Register

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Very small college outlet (btwn 400 and 1500 copies weekly). Doesn't meet WP:GNG. I was not able to find sources that indicate notability. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 20:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Why not redirect to University of Minnesota Morris? Colapeninsula (talk) 11:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep' note that Some alums go on to journalism careers, and sources do exist - I just added 2 to the page, located in the process of assessing notability. In general, I think news media, even student news media, should be kept, articles on media are and extremely useful part of an encyclopedia. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 02:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, in general university newspapers should be kept, along with defunct historical newspapers, it is a lot like how we are a gazetteer for places, these are places that are sources. -- do ncr  am  18:15, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - seems like a decent spin-off from the UMM page, passes V, NPOV. NOR is a bit hazy, as different media are interdependent, but I don't see how this isn't suitable for inclusion in wikipedia. Smmurphy(Talk) 18:32, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.