Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Mediran ( t  •  c ) 02:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

The Unlikely Pilgrimage of Harold Fry

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Whole page is a plot summary, delete as per WP:PLOT elphantsandbacon   Care to talk? 15:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Milowent • hasspoken 03:05, 28 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article is but a few hours old.  It needs improvement as the nominator states, but I don't see that as a valid reason for a nomination here.  This certainly seems to be a notable novel, top 12 finalist for the 2012 Man Booker Prize, bestselling hardcover book from a new author in the UK for 2012, widespread critical attention, etc.  With some work, I am sure we can all agree the AfD can be truncated.--Milowent • hasspoken  03:07, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep The New York times gives it a complete review. So does the Washington Post, among many others.    D r e a m Focus  03:19, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Major additions and minor edits have been made. No need to delete. Roger1uk (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Improvements and inline references mean that this article is shown to be notable and well documented. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.