Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unloved Woman (1940 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep or speedy keep. The nom meets WP:SK1 and subsequent discussion shows consensus that the film meets both WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:36, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

The Unloved Woman (1940 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This page only has one citation. No source is given to verify the cast either. Further more doesn't have enough content. Sincerely,    Masum Reza ☎  09:27, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 09:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 09:43, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep It is referenced to a reliable source, it passes WP:NFILM, and the nominator has provided no policy-based reasons for deletion, per WP:ITSNOTABLE / WP:UGLY. ——  SerialNumber  54129  09:44, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It looks like the nominator has gone through and nominated multiple film articles. This article is entirely noteworthy and passes WP:GNG. This is not a suitable candidate for AfD. Skirts89 10:00, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep - Does not have enough content is not a reason to AfD an article as article can be a sub class and still be inclusive in Wikipedia. it is a Spanish speaking film in 1940. Online sources is limited especially in English. Added 2 sources and believe more sources would be found in Spanish article. The article passed WP:NFILM Inclusionary criteria #3.<b style="font-family:Georgia;font-size:80%;color:#FA0"> CASSIOPEIA</b>(<b style="#0000FF">talk</b>) 10:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: Poor AfD rationale for a film which is verifiable to multiple reference books. Meets WP:NFILM. AllyD (talk) 10:17, 25 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.