Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vacancy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Bobet 10:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

The Vacancy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged for db-band, but there are some assertions of notability, so moving to AFD instead. Punkmorten 08:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Whoop-dee-doo, they have two album that "sold poorly." YechielMan 16:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep According to WP:Music this article falls as notable as being on a notable label and having released two records off the label. -- St.daniel talk 21:50, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Just not famous enough to be entitled to their own article. I agree with YechieMan. Jmlk17 09:05, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons given above. I don't think the record releases are enough in this case on their own. However article claims a current US tour and that the records were critically well received. If references to this so-claimed favourable critcism or tour reviews from non trivial sources can be provided by the end of this AfD, then I change my vote to Weak Keep. A1octopus 13:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.