Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vannacutt Psychiatric Institute for the Criminally Insane

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect -- Francs2000 | Talk 11:14, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

The Vannacutt Psychiatric Institute for the Criminally Insane
Delete.Does this really belong to Wikipedia? With "UNDER CONSTRUCTION" notes as well. mu5ti/talk 03:15, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * It's just as valid a topic as Arkham Asylum. However, because the main article isn't too long, this can be merged with the 1999 movie, unless it's in both versions of House on Haunted Hill, in which case Keep CanadianCaesar 03:32, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the whole entire article can be merged with the House on Haunted Hill(1999) article. But it needs vast spelling\grammar improvements and also needs to be completed... User:ligersrock2487 01:02, July 25, 2005
 * Delete: There's nothing here, folks. You want someone to write something about the fictional place in the fictional films?  Ok, let them do so.  No "keep" involved.  Blow this up, as it is not an article and nearly qualifies for speedy. Geogre 18:36, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * How's there "nothing here"? I see information that's not on the main page.  I see a picture.  I see no reason not to merge.  CanadianCaesar 19:03, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Image "from the official website." Then a number of paragraphs that repeat each other (the plot is told twice).  Other than the first sentence, the whole of it is presented as if fact.  No, there's nothing there.  There is no discussion, no context, no placement of the object in any world other than the movie.  So, knock it out.  Then people can work on the movie article, if they choose.  This infinite fracturing of every fiction to suit the fancies of fans is ridiculous, illogical, and, in the end, a good way to destroy the information by stranding it in places where people cannot find it.  Geogre 01:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with House on Haunted Hill (1999 movie) and Redirect. No information is lost and it makes sense.  Wikibofh 23:13, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to House on Haunted Hill (1999 movie) any information that is important enough to be on that page; I'd suggest deeply cutting it, though, and merging perhaps one paragraph. If it's not important enough to be part of the parent fiction, it's unencyclopedic. CDC   (talk)  23:29, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as a prime example of non-notability. Nandesuka 01:15, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge -- anything useful into House on Haunted Hill (1999) and redirect. - Longhair | Talk 12:39, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge -- anything useful into House on Haunted Hill (1999). carmeld1 23:46, 26 July 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.