Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Venery of Samantha Bird


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Arguments to keep are weak, given that the sources are fairly routine in my view. That said, there is not consensus to delete the article, perhaps due to a lack of participation.  Malinaccier ( talk ) 14:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

The Venery of Samantha Bird

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I would argue that this fails the notability criteria: since the article is based on routine press coverage, and there's not much more mentions in reliable sources after the show did not move forward in September 2023. Maybe the specific guideline is WP:NOTNEWS, but I've seen most unaired television/film articles that do not have extensive coverage beyond cancellation be draftified, so maybe draftifying is the best option? I'm open to other options, though. Spinixster  (trout me!)  09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United States of America.  Spinixster   (trout me!)  09:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla  Ohhhhhh, no! 09:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - Passes GNG from sources showing in the footnotes — multiple instances of published, significant coverage about the subject in sources of presumed reliability. Carrite (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but it's all routine press coverage, no sources show that the cancelled series is notable after its cancellation. Not all cancelled series/films with routine press coverage are notable, and if it is, might as well make pages for the 200+ series and films that have been cancelled. Spinixster   (trout me!)  00:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep: coverage seems sufficient to have a page (with notable cast, production history, premise verified). If really there's no consensus about that being enough, then redirect to Starz and add a line there with a few of the sources from this article (but I think it's not necessary and personally find it would be a pity). - My, oh my! (Mushy Yank)  00:04, 11 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.