Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Vino Vixen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOFTDELETE The Bushranger One ping only 02:51, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Vino Vixen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find any evidence that the subject meets the criteria in WP:CREATIVE, or WP:BIO more generally. Three pages of results in the Google News archive for "vino vixen": some are irrelevant, some are passing mentions of her in her employer's paper, and the rest are articles by her. A search for "Mari Stull" fares no better. General search produces more of the same: her own web site, the Wikipedia entry itself, a blog by another "vino vixen", social media, etc. Alexrexpvt (talk) 13:40, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wine-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 13:58, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:10, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 02:30, 22 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.