Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. While the article might not have been in great shape at the time of nomination, I trust the opinions of the editors weighing in here on the value of the film. It looks like work is already being done to improve this article. Liz Read! Talk! 21:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

The Virgin Queen of St. Francis High
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Article has longstanding problems, which have not been solved despite a previous AfD. Questionable notability. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:27, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep While the article is in terrible shape, there is the LA Times review (which I verified) and this review I found . There is a claim of the San Francisco Chronicle review, but unless someone has access to their archives it can't be verified, but we have to assume good faith that that article does exist. After all, when a citation is used in a printed book, we can't verify it, but we accept it. In any case, with the 2 that are verified, I believe the film passes WP:NFILM  Donald D23   talk to me  02:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added a bit to the article myself. I also found a source that mentions a really scathing Variety review, which in turn implies wider coverage. Apparently this movie was extremely poorly received in the US, to the point where the audience at a Hollywood screening was openly jeered. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:03, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: Can anyone help w/ finishing the plot? Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 16:43, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the multiple reviews in reliable sources such as The Los Angeles Times and San Francisco Chronicle so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Light Keep I have some concerns about notability, but I think the article is just poorly put together. Sources of coverage seem WP:GNG-passable, so I lean keep. Gnomatique (talk) 00:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.