Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The WINTYR


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Userfy. As per consensus and agreement from article's creator. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 13:58, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

The WINTYR

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article created by a band member; the only non-self-published source is to their iTunes info; doesn't seem to check any of the boxes at WP:BAND Slashme (talk) 12:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The article creator is certainly acting in good faith, and even reached out to a relevant WikiProject for feedback, so please be careful not to WP:BITE him. --Slashme (talk) 14:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination; also can't find any significant coverage online from WP:RS. Norvoid (talk) 13:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   TALK    15:50, 27 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Clearly not yet notable, not even WP:GNG. SwisterTwister   talk  19:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Hi guys. Clearly I'm quite new to this. I understand the points and I did the best I could to provide factual reference for support. I am open to guidance if you can point me. It it's someone else that has to write it then so be it. I am after all, still learning here. Many thanks! tristcarmichael
 * For this to be fully notable and acceptable, it needs in-depth third-party sources overall from coverage such as news and magazine. If you want, this can be drafted and userfied to User:Tristcarmichael/Sandbox. SwisterTwister   talk  21:14, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

talk sure, I understand..If it can be drafted into my sandbox for now I will update it with the relevant news and third-party sources in the coming weeks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tristcarmichael (talk • contribs) 06:17, 28 November 2015 (UTC) Roger (Dodger67) (talk) Sure, I understand. This info all follow shortly. There are a few press coverages coming. As I said in my above comment, I don't mind it being moved into my sandbox for now.
 * Userify per above. This group is simply far too new to have received significant mainstream press coverage yet. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.