Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wahid Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:21, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

The Wahid Institute

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable institute with reference consisting only of its own page. In theory qualfies for A7, but put it here just to be safe. Ack! Ack! Pasta bomb! (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * You're probably just trying to direct some attention to the stub article so it gets extended, right? Otherwise your assumption of non-notability is hilarious. --PanchoS (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (confabulate)  @ 14:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (warn)  @ 14:19, 28 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, a quick check on google and google books plus some common sense confirms that this is indeed a notable institution. --Soman (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:02, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (push)  @ 21:34, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The article isn't particularly poorly written though it does need work and it doesn't seem to reflect the depth of coverage. Even a Google news search along with the already-available sources in the article seem to indicate a mildly international audience, independent coverage and a decent amount of depth. It seems like a short article about a notable subject and it could potentially be improved quite a bit. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - They're notable if they're coordinating events with the Simon Wiesenthal Center.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 10:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Wahid is a big deal in Indo HenryKlay (talk) 18:50, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. wp:BEFORE not performed? -- do  ncr  am  19:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.