Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Wall Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 07:17, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wall Project

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable albeit large school musical with no independent sources Murtoa (talk) 11:06, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Murtoa (talk) 11:16, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't know - it seems to be a project which involves a large number of people, and, with a few extra sources, perhaps from local newspapers, it could do rather well as an article... Colds7ream (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Advertising for future production, although well-meaning.--Grahame (talk) 00:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Just clarifying that the Wall Project is not an "large school musical" as described by Murtoa, its an charitable initiative by Wesley College and Nuworks. It features the theatrical performance but will also include other activities. Sheepunderscore (talk) 09:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Nuworks appears to simply be the operating arm of the director of the musical who is very closely aligned to musical productions over the years at the Glen Waverley campus of Wesley College. This musical is very much aligned simply with the school - the only publicity or coverage at all to date has been a brochure for school parents and involvement in the project appears limited to Wesley present and past students. Also, any planned additional activities outside the musical remain totally unspecified at present. Murtoa (talk) 23:03, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Doesn't meet WP:N and is spammy. Nick-D (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 09:34, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

1. The Director of Wesley Student Theatre - Glen Waverley Campus is currently also the director of Nuworks which is an independent company. 2. Community involvement: Dandenong Brass Band, past & present staff & parents and local primary school. 3. Involves a large amount of people & planning. 4. It is NOT an ordinary musical because it is an charitable initiative which features a theatrical production, this project if of large significance.Sheepunderscore (talk) 10:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment
 * Comment 1. merely confirms that for the purpose of this production, Nuworks and Wesley are closely linked. The person in question directs most of the school productions at the GW campus. Neither 2 nor 3 confer notability. Re 4, there is simply no evidence that it has any significance beyond the theatrical production.  That it is charitable doesn't confer notability. Murtoa (talk) 22:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Just left a message for WP:AUS to take a look, seems to be in their area. Personally, I'm leaning towards deleting because nothing is turning up. Hiding T 11:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Nick-D and Grahamec, as I can't find anything either - it seems to be a school production with some outside help. Orderinchaos 15:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Quite interesting, particularly being a major Floyd fan, but sponsorship by a charitable organization does not imply notability to me. If the original artists were some how involved, it might be worthwhile, particularly if major articles by independent sources were written, but that does not appear to be the case.  Perhaps this will change as the project draws closer.  Oh, and it suffers from some WP:CRYSTAL issues which I will fix just after this. -Verdatum (talk) 20:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment perhaps leave a small comment about it on the school's article.58.175.156.135 (talk) 06:17, 2 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.