Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The War Zone (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 20:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

The War Zone (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. The article's references are either primary sources or passing mentions, in the style of "first reported by The War Zone" with a link to the related article. A WP:BEFORE doesn't bring anything more than that.  Billets Mauves €500 15:12, 16 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‡ El cid, el campeador  talk  21:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete in absence of source demonstrating WP:GNG and/or WP:WEBCRIT is met. Existing sourcing is non-independent, passing mentions, or a press release. None come even close to meeting GNG, let alone there being the multiple such sources required. A brief search online reveals no further sourcing to remedy the situation. -Ljleppan (talk) 07:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.