Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The War of Turkish Presidential Elections


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Original research (as a concept and as a synthesis, not all individual facts are OR obviously) and POV. The latter can be corrected, but not the former. Fram 13:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

The War of Turkish Presidential Elections

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article is an exact copy-paste of early created article; Turkish presidential election, 2007 Must . T  C
 * it is not the same article.if you read.it is getting better.--3210 23:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletions.   Must . T  C  06:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete - Possibly just nonsense so might be a speedy delete but even if not is just a fork of the main article. Davewild 07:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Things are not to be seen in Turkey--3210 23:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge back into the original article, if any content was added. If not, just redirect. &mdash; Nightst a  llion  (?) 11:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The first sentence is a POV, unsourced (and as far as I know wrong) addition, it has a POV title. We even have this: " No individuals have officially declared their interest", and we have only 3 weeks to the election. History part can be added if true. denizTC 18:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It may be history part . But there is like a war in turkey--3210 23:18, 18 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Also the second addition (about Ataturk's election) is using a reference a blog site, it should be replaced. denizTC 23:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge no need for dupe. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 23:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, merge, redirect whatever is necessary. I don't think that there is a lot of new content in this article, but if there is just merge.. Baristarim 04:46, 13 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment
 * Additions are:
 * first sentence: "Turkish presedential elections always were controversial run-ups in the Presidential election history of the Turkish Republic"
 * section:The History of Turkish Presidential Elections: " 	Turkish precedential elections were allways disputed like a war. 2007 election going to be the most contvercial dispute.see:[] === Atatürk === Atatürk was elected by 158 MP's of the patlement. All members of the TBMM were 334 MP's. But only 158 MP's participated in election.He elected full votes of partisipated 158 MP's vote. [] === İnönü=== ===Bayar==="
 * removals are:
 * There will be a public demonstration at 14 April 2007 against Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğans' candidacy (some groups are oppose to any candidate from AKP). It is expected that a huge participation will be in this demonstration.
 * Candidacies will be officicially declared; beginning from 16 April 2007 till to 24:00,25 April 2007. Must . T  C  08:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Abdullah Gül, Foreign affair Minister, Deputy prime Minister, Justice and Development Party.
 * denizTC 07:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, I transferred "additions" to original page, except first POV-baseles sentence. additional improvements are being done in original page. Must . T  C 08:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete-speedy as nominator. Must . T  C 08:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * delete per above. Duplicate--Sefringle 09:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Turkish presedent elections always do act like a war. 2007 spesific election does not mean turkish election history.--3210 12:05, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not create notions, it reflects what is out there. Can you please tell us, which elections were like a war and who called them a war, or who said anything like "war of presidential elections in Turkey"? You are making a lot of unsourced and original research claims. It does not help bolding out some huge parts of the text. denizTC 02:59, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As far as i know ozal, demirel ,sezer,inönü, seemed like a war. even atatürk election(according to karabekir pasha ,İstiklal harbimiz book) was difficult. Half of the parlement did not partisipated the election. Look at the newspapers archivies of Özal before and after Presedency time, and sezer election times (how anti EU groups did do possible candidate Sadi Somuncuoğlu) ,what abaout Fuat Köprülü candidance???--3210 00:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please see talk page, we should not continue the discussion here, and please stop adding unsourced POV claims. denizTC 05:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No redirect. No evidence to suggest this title relates any more to the 2007 elections than those held in any other year. WjBscribe 15:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No good sources, no good structure... Some data from the article can be used in the 2007 Presidental Election article but thats all. Nearly rubbish... Deliogul 22:19, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - obvious POV fork, POV title. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.